Learning design platform for UK higher education

Activities your students think through, not click through.

Generated from your learning outcomes. SOLO-level classification and assessment modality analysis determine the interaction structure.

Currently in pilot with select UK universities.

aidemia.co.uk/modules/builder
Tools
Module Builder
Lecture Builder
Activity Designer
Module
CourseBSc Health & Social Care
LevelSCQF 9
Weeks12
Advanced Safeguarding in Healthcare
12 weekly topics · 24 learning outcomes · 2 assessment points
WkTopic
1Safeguarding Legislation & PolicyGuided Analysis
2Risk Assessment FrameworksWorkspace
3Multi-Agency CollaborationScenario Explorer
4Capacity & ConsentClassification
5Disclosure & Information SharingRanking
6Clinical Decision-Making Under Pressure
7Trauma-Informed Practice
8Supervision & Reflective Practice
SCQF 7–12 / FHEQ 4–8
UK-hosted & GDPR compliant
Embeds in Moodle · Canvas · Blackboard · Teams
Same learning outcome

This is what your students get today. And what they could get.

The typical VLE quiz
Quiz: Healthcare Quality Frameworks
Question 1 of 10
Which of the following is NOT one of the six dimensions of healthcare quality in the Healthcare Improvement Scotland (HIS) framework?
a) Person-Centred
b) Safe
c) Profitable
d) Effective
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Time remaining: 14:32Attempt 1 of 2
VS
Aidemia activities
aidemia.co.uk/activities
Workspace Novel Design
Procedure Library
Learning OutcomeEvaluate the six dimensions of healthcare quality (HIS framework)
Workspace
Outcome Person-Centred Safe Effective Efficient Equitable Timely
☰ Place evidence
☰ Cross-link
☰ Rank by impact
☰ Evaluate trade-offs
Learning OutcomeApply the PDSA cycle to a ward-level quality improvement scenario
Procedure
Plan Do Study Act
What specific change are you testing?
How will you measure improvement?
What did the data show?
What will you modify next cycle?
Recall vs evaluation. Same learning outcome — a static quiz or an interactive activity that cycles between two formats.
Sound familiar?

Sunday evening. Module starts Monday. You're still building slides.

Recycled lecture slides
Generic Moodle quizzes
Students clicking through, not thinking
Activities that don't match the level
No time to do it properly

Most tools make this worse by generating more of the same. Aidemia does something different.

What makes this different

Other platforms fill templates.
Aidemia invents the interaction.

Type a learning outcome. The AI reads the cognitive demands — the verbs, the level, the relationships — and designs an activity structure you didn't know existed.

Not templates with your content

"Evaluate" produces a fundamentally different activity than "Identify." The interaction pattern is invented from the outcome, not selected from a library.

Library + Novel Design

11 proven formats for reliability. Or let Novel Design create something original — a branching scenario, a phased investigation, a drag-based comparison.

You review before students see it

Every activity goes through a mandatory tutor review gate. Play through it, refine it, regenerate. The AI proposes. You decide.

aidemia.co.uk/activities/designer
Tools
Module Builder
Lecture Builder
Activity Designer
From library
11 formats
Novel design
AI-designed
LO
Evaluate the six dimensions of healthcare quality (HIS framework)
Apply quantitative methods to analyse psychological data sets
Prioritise competing clinical assessment findings under time pressure
Ranking · Novel Design
1
Person-Centred
⸮⸮
2
Safe
⸮⸮
3
Effective
⸮⸮
4
Efficient
⸮⸮
5
Equitable
⸮⸮
6
Timely
⸮⸮
Justify: Why does your top-ranked dimension take priority in an acute care setting?
Classification · Library
Descriptive
Inferential
Non-parametric
Mean, Median, Mode
t-test, ANOVA
Chi-square
Standard deviation
Regression
Mann-Whitney U
Frequency dist.
Correlation
Kruskal-Wallis
Drag here ↕
Drag here ↕
Drag here ↕
Scenario Explorer · Novel
Patient: SOB + chest pain Order cardiac enzymes Chest X-ray Stabilise + O₂ now Troponin elevated Troponin normal ⚡ Justify reasoning against NICE CG95
SimulationGuided AnalysisClassificationScenario ExplorerDrag & DropRankingProcedureConcept ExplorerArgument BuilderWorkspaceClassroom Plan
Home
Insert
BSc_Psychology_Programme_Spec.docx
BSc (Hons) Psychology
Programme Specification 2024–25 · 47 pages · 20 modules · 63 learning outcomes
PSYC07001Introduction to PsychologySCQF 7
PSYC08003Research Methods ISCQF 8
PSYC09011Advanced TopicsSCQF 9
PSYC10002Honours DissertationSCQF 10
3 of 47
Under the surface
You see a programme specification. Aidemia sees computable structure.
Real programmes. Real data. Every gap, progression pattern, and alignment issue — 47 pages, 12 seconds.
aidemia.co.uk/tutor/programme-analysis
BSc Psychology
BSc Psychology (RI)
Health & Social Care
Forensic Science
Creative Practice
Fingerprint
Quality signals
Modality
SOLO progression
Programme fingerprint
Cross-institutional comparison · Psychology
Quality signals
RAG assessment · 5 dimensions
Modality distribution
Assessment types across all modules
Cognitive progression
SOLO taxonomy · year-by-year
Live analysisAnalysed 20 modules · Cross-institutional comparison · 6 debt items
Academic calibration

Same topic. Two levels. Completely different activities.

SCQF 7 · 1st Year
Patient Assessment
Drag-and-drop classification: sort assessment techniques into correct body system categories. Recognition-based, building foundational vocabulary.
Activity type: Classification
SCQF 11 · Masters
Patient Assessment
Branching clinical scenario: prioritise competing assessment findings, justify reasoning against evidence, evaluate conflicting guidelines under time pressure.
Activity type: Novel Design

Covers SCQF Levels 7–12 (Scotland) and FHEQ Levels 4–8 (England & Wales).

Generation quality tested across health & social care, psychology, forensic science, and creative practice at SCQF 7–11. Discursive disciplines with clearly articulated learning outcomes produce the strongest results. Evidence base expanding across disciplines and institutions — 2026.

Build your first module this afternoon

One module title, one learning outcome, one SCQF level. First activity in under 60 seconds.

Request Early Access

Currently in pilot with select UK universities.

Questions?
Common questions
What happens when I register?
You’ll enter a module title, one learning outcome, and a SCQF level. The platform generates an interactive activity in approximately 45–90 seconds. No institutional credentials or IT approval required.
How much does it cost?
Free to start. You can build modules, generate activities, and review them at no cost. Usage-based pricing for high-volume generation is transparent and shown in the platform.
Do I need IT support or institutional approval?
No. Individual tutors sign up directly. No IT integration required. Activities run in any browser via a simple URL.
How do students access the activities?
Each activity has a unique URL. Share it directly, embed it in your VLE (Moodle, Canvas, Blackboard), or link from any learning platform. Self-contained HTML, works on any device, no student accounts needed.
Can I edit what the AI generates?
Yes. Every activity goes through a mandatory tutor review gate. You play through it, refine it, or regenerate it entirely. The AI proposes. You decide.
Is it GDPR compliant?
Yes. Aidemia is built and hosted in the UK and compliant with UK GDPR. Student data is not shared with AI models.
What academic frameworks does it support?
SCQF Levels 7 to 12 (Scotland) and FHEQ Levels 4 to 8 (England and Wales). Activities are calibrated to the cognitive demands of each level. Any discipline.